Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review
Menu
  • Home
  • About MBELR
    • Current Editorial Board
    • Past Boards
      • Volume 11
      • Volume 10
      • Volume 9
      • Volume 8
      • Volume 7
      • Volume 6
      • Volume 5
      • Volume 4
      • Volume 3
      • Volume 2
      • Volume 1
    • Subscribe
    • Submit Work
  • Print
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
  • MBELR Blog
    • Blog Posts
      • Vol. 14 Blog Posts
      • Vol. 13 Blog Posts
      • Vol. 12 Blog Posts
Menu

Author: Andrew Kang

The SEC’s clarification to the unbundling rule and what it means for corporate inversions

Posted on December 1, 2015 by Andrew Kang

Rule 14a-4(a)(3) of the Exchange Act of 1934 requires that the form of proxy “identify clearly and impartially each separate matter intended to be acted upon.”1 Rule 14a-4(b)(1) further requires that the form of proxy provide separate boxes for shareholders to choose between approval, disapproval or abstention “with respect to each separate matter referred to…

The Uncertain Future of the “Accredited Investor” Definition

Posted on October 13, 2015 by Andrew Kang

Introduction: what is an “accredited investor” and why does it matter? Under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Act”), the issuer of any securities offering must follow the strict registration and disclosure requirements of the Securities & Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), unless such offering is subject to an exemption.1 One such exemption applies to offerings…

© 2025 Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme